Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Altug Celikbilek vs Maxwell Mckennon Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Celikbilek vs Mckennon analysis and find out who is favored!
Altug Celikbilek vs Maxwell Mckennon Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Celikbilek 1 - 0 Mckennon
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Celikbilek has won 45.36% of points on their second serve, while Mckennon has won 49.21%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Celikbilek, in recent form, has won 51.06% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mckennon has won 48.24%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.31% and 32.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Celikbilek has saved 61.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mckennon has saved 55.1% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Celikbilek has won 48.15% of matches played (W/L 26/ 28), with Mckennon winning 54.84% (W/L 17/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Celikbilek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 252/ 178), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 30/ 40). Mckennon has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 19/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Celikbilek has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.78% of matches (W/L 20/ 21), where as Mckennon has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.17% of matches (W/L 13/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Celikbilek winning 1 times and Mckennon being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Celikbilek winning 2 and Mckennon winning 0. The last match between Celikbilek and Mckennon was at the M25 Bakersfield, 12-03-2019, First, Hard with Altug Celikbilek getting the victory 6-4 7-6(1).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Celikbilek and Mckennon have played a deciding set 0 times, with Celikbilek winning 0 times and Mckennon 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Celikbilek winning 1, and Mckennon 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Celikbilek has played against opponents with an average rank of 304.22 while Mckennon has played against players with an average rank of 104.87.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Celikbilek has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mckennon has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Celikbilek has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mckennon has converted 45.65% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
398
Rank
154
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
56% (349-275)
Career Total W/L
50% (22-22)
54% (15-13)
YTD W/L
50% (4-4)
$231,155
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Celikbilek VS Mckennon H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Altug Celikbilek | Maxwell Mckennon |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:0 | 1:18:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (33/59) | 62% (40/65) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 88% (29/33) | 68% (27/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (17/26) | 56% (14/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (24/65) | 22% (13/59) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Celikbilek VS Mckennon H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(1) |
Stats 
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
13 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Altug Celikbilek | Maxwell Mckennon |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (15/13) | 50% (4/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (38/31) | 47% (9/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (354/310) | 50% (84/83) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.53 | 0.36 |
| Aces Total | 173 | 29 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 68 | 23 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:28 | 1:39:17 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 286.75 | 201 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1262/2049) | 64% (333/522) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (903/1262) | 68% (227/333) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (357/787) | 49% (93/189) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (84/196) | 46% (21/46) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (791/2021) | 39% (195/501) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (12/11) | 57% (4/3) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (15/28) | 50% (4/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (5/13) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 69% (16/11) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 31% (16/5) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (12/4) | 33% (6/2) |
Altug Celikbilek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Altug Celikbilek
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
50%
(
57 of
113)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Altug Celikbilek
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Altug Celikbilek
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Linang Xiao
67%
(
79 of
118)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
110)
27
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
63 of
79)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
36 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
33 of
110)
115
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
38 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fajing Sun
Player
Altug Celikbilek
65%
(
72 of
110)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
92)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
107
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Jie Cui
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Altug Celikbilek
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
112)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
8
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Sanhui Shin
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Maxwell Mckennon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
Keegan Smith
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
George Goldhoff
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
11
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
65
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
Nicholas Godsick
79%
(
55 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
Andre Ilagan
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alafia Ayeni
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
55%
(
60 of
109)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
101)
10
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
83%
(
50 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
43%
(
21 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
101)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
Max Sheldon
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Celikbilek Vs Mckennon Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
